Anas Idarisi said Ahmad Idarisi vs State of Mah. P.S.Khaparkheda — 362/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG090046352025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
4001/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
362/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
KHAPARKHEDA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anas Idarisi said Ahmad Idarisi
Adv. KALE PRAVIN NATTHUJI
Respondent(s)
State of Mah. P.S.Khaparkheda
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court granted interim custody of a seized trolley (Registration No. MH-40-CA-2131) to the applicant Anas Idarisi Said Ahmad Idarisi, the registered owner, under Section 503 of BNSS. The court reasoned that since no confiscation proceedings had been initiated by the Tahsildar despite the serious charges (BNS Sections 303(2) and 49, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, Mines and Minerals Act), keeping the vehicle idle at the police station would cause damage without justification during the lengthy trial. The applicant must furnish a ₹2,00,000 indemnity bond and comply with conditions including prohibition on alteration, disposal, or unlawful use of the vehicle until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted interim custody of a seized trolley (Registration No. MH-40-CA-2131) to the applicant Anas Idarisi Said Ahmad Idarisi, the registered owner, under Section 503 of BNSS. The court reasoned that since no confiscation proceedings had been initiated by the Tahsildar despite the serious charges (BNS Sections 303(2) and 49, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, Mines and Minerals Act), keeping the vehicle idle at the police station would cause damage without justification during the lengthy trial. The applicant must furnish a ₹2,00,000 indemnity bond and comply with conditions including prohibition on alteration, disposal, or unlawful use of the vehicle until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts