State of Maharashtra P.S.Khapa vs Roshan Urph Pintu Gangadhar Wankhede — 514/2025

Case under Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG090044352025

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

3819/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

514/2025

Registration Date

09-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

FIR Details

FIR Number

175

Police Station

KHAPA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY ACT Section 3
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code Section 48(7),48(8)
MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT Section 21,4

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra P.S.Khapa

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Roshan Urph Pintu Gangadhar Wankhede

Praful Gangadhar Wankhede

Hearing History

Judge: 9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

17-04-2026

Order on Exh

06-04-2026

Order on Exh

01-04-2026

Order on Exh

18-03-2026

Order on Exh

10-03-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

17-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

PETITION ALLOWED The application filed by Roshan Gangadhar Wankhede for return of his seized tractor (Registration No. MH-40-AM-0831) was allowed. The court directed the investigating officer to hand over the vehicle to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 5,00,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, transfer, or alter the vehicle until trial conclusion and must produce it in court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

PETITION ALLOWED The application filed by Roshan Gangadhar Wankhede for return of his seized tractor (Registration No. MH-40-AM-0831) was allowed. The court directed the investigating officer to hand over the vehicle to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 5,00,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, transfer, or alter the vehicle until trial conclusion and must produce it in court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case