Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner. vs Pramod Urfh Bandu Vitthalrao Pendam — 1528/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090038042022

Filing Number

2511/2022

Filing Date

11-Oct-2022

Registration No

1528/2022

Registration Date

11-Oct-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

1.Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Pramod Urfh Bandu Vitthalrao Pendam

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: The JMFC Saoner discharged the accused Pramod @ Bandu Vitthalrao Pendam under Section 258 of CrPC, 1973, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory Chemical Analysis report despite having sufficient time. Due to the absence of critical evidence, the court found it impossible to proceed with the case on merit and therefore stopped proceedings and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
17-Dec-2025

Appearance

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
11-Dec-2024

Appearance

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
29-Nov-2023

Appearance

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
08-Mar-2023

Appearance

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
11-Oct-2022

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Oct-2022

Case filed

Registration No. 1528/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The JMFC Saoner discharged the accused Pramod @ Bandu Vitthalrao Pendam under Section 258 of CrPC, 1973, in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory Chemical Analysis report despite having sufficient time. Due to the absence of critical evidence, the court found it impossible to proceed with the case on merit and therefore stopped proceedings and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.