Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner. vs Roshan Shantaram Dhobale — 2220/2025

Case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 33,131(3). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090034232025

Filing Number

2960/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

2220/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

SAONER

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Police Act Section 33,131(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshan Shantaram Dhobale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The National Public Interest Court at Saoner convicted Roshan Shantaram Dhobale under sections 33 and 131(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act for operating a hotel/shop without authorization on June 21, 2025, during restricted hours. The accused pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500, with simple imprisonment for 15 days as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  4. 13-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  6. 09-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2220/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The National Public Interest Court at Saoner convicted Roshan Shantaram Dhobale under sections 33 and 131(3) of the Maharashtra Police Act for operating a hotel/shop without authorization on June 21, 2025, during restricted hours. The accused pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500, with simple imprisonment for 15 days as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case