Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner. vs Prmod Dinkar Chaudhary — 1449/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090026402023

Filing Number

3278/2023

Filing Date

24-Jul-2023

Registration No

1449/2023

Registration Date

24-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

446

Police Station

SAONER

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prmod Dinkar Chaudhary

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings and discharged the accused Pramod Dinkar Chaudhary under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory Chemical Analysis report despite having sufficient time. The seized liquor was directed to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  4. 18-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  5. 21-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  6. 13-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  7. 24-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1449/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings and discharged the accused Pramod Dinkar Chaudhary under Section 258 of the CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory Chemical Analysis report despite having sufficient time. The seized liquor was directed to be sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case