State of Mah. P.S.Saoner vs Rashmi pintu Langde — 997/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 112. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG090018492023
Filing Number
1745/2023
Filing Date
01-Jun-2023
Registration No
997/2023
Registration Date
01-Jun-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Mah. P.S.Saoner
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rashmi pintu Langde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged the accused Rashmi Pintu Langde of Motor Vehicle Act offenses under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, due to the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence for over three years despite continuous efforts. The proceedings were terminated as the case could not be decided on merit under normal procedure given the accused's prolonged absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
10-Dec-2025
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
13-Sep-2025
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
10-May-2025
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
22-Mar-2025
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
14-Dec-2024
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
28-Sep-2024
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
27-Jul-2024
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
25-Apr-2024
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
-
01-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 997/2023
The court discharged the accused Rashmi Pintu Langde of Motor Vehicle Act offenses under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, due to the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence for over three years despite continuous efforts. The proceedings were terminated as the case could not be decided on merit under normal procedure given the accused's prolonged absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts