Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner. vs Pappu Rukkaji Nimje — 871/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090016382023

Filing Number

1505/2023

Filing Date

15-May-2023

Registration No

871/2023

Registration Date

15-May-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

177

Police Station

SAONER

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner.

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pappu Rukkaji Nimje

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Saoner Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged the accused (Pappu Rukkji Nimje) in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory Chemical Analysis report despite having sufficient time. The court found it impossible to decide the case on merit without this critical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  5. 24-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  6. 14-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  7. 10-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  8. 15-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 871/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Saoner Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged the accused (Pappu Rukkji Nimje) in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, because the prosecution failed to file the mandatory Chemical Analysis report despite having sufficient time. The court found it impossible to decide the case on merit without this critical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case