Gat Grampanchayat,Sawangi (Ghogli) vs Buddha Vihar, Ghogli Ratnmala Tagde President Advocate - C. K. Barethiya — 12/2023
Case under National Highways Act Section 3H(4). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHNG090015952023
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
309/2023
Filing Date
27-04-2023
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
27-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
12-Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gat Grampanchayat,Sawangi (Ghogli)
Adv. N. D. Anjankar
Respondent(s)
Buddha Vihar, Ghogli Ratnmala Tagde President Advocate - C. K. Barethiya
Zilha Parishad Prathmik Shala, Ghogli
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 28-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Evidence
Summary: This is a hearing transcript (L.A.R. No. 12/2023) in case G.P. Ghogli vs. Buddha Vihar before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner, dated 16.09.2025. The witness Nita Sanjay Tabhane (Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Ghogli) completed her examination-in-chief and cross-examination regarding property ownership disputes involving two Buddha Vihars and land assessment lists. The court deferred further cross-examination due to a recess period; no final order was passed on this date as the proceedings remain ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a hearing transcript (L.A.R. No. 12/2023) in case G.P. Ghogli vs. Buddha Vihar before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner, dated 16.09.2025. The witness Nita Sanjay Tabhane (Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Ghogli) completed her examination-in-chief and cross-examination regarding property ownership disputes involving two Buddha Vihars and land assessment lists. The court deferred further cross-examination due to a recess period; no final order was passed on this date as the proceedings remain ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts