Pundlik Bhagwan Bambal vs Leelabai Arvind Vyavhare and Others — 48/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG090012162024

e-Filing Number

30-04-2024

Filing Number

231/2024

Filing Date

03-May-2024

Registration No

48/2024

Registration Date

03-May-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

12-Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pundlik Bhagwan Bambal

    Adv. P. R. Naikwade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Leelabai Arvind Vyavhare and Others

  2. 2.Satish Arvind Vyavhare

  3. 3.Sachin Arvind Vyavhare

  4. 4.Vaishali Arvind Vyavhare

  5. 5.Latabai Prabhakar Lonkar

  6. 6.Satyafula Marotrao Wankhede

  7. 7.Nalini Rajendra Deshmukh

  8. 8.Rakesh Rajendra Deshmukh

  9. 9.Sachin Rajendra Deshmukh

  10. 10.Prajakta Uday Hule

  11. 11.Rajeshwar Kisanji Sonare

  12. 12.Deputy Superintendent Of Land Records Kalmeshwar

  13. 13.District Superintendent, Land Records Office Nagpur

  14. 14.Deputy Director Land Records Office Nagpur

  15. 15.Tahsildar Kalmeshwar

  16. 16.Sub Divisional Officer Saoner

  17. 17.Collector, Nagpur

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  5. 31-Oct-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  6. 25-Sep-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  7. 14-Aug-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  8. 05-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  9. 01-Aug-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary Pundalik v. Leelabai & Others (R.C.S. No.48/2024) The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendants nos. 11 and 18 are restrained from disturbing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of field Survey no. 195/2 and from creating any third-party interest over field Survey no. 196 until the suit is decided. The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  12. 31-Jul-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  15. 26-Jun-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  17. 08-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 08-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    Notice Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  24. 25-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  25. 19-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  26. 30-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  27. 29-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  28. 18-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner

  29. 13-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 03-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Pundalik v. Leelabai & Others (R.C.S. No.48/2024) The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendants nos. 11 and 18 are restrained from disturbing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of field Survey no. 195/2 and from creating any third-party interest over field Survey no. 196 until the suit is decided. The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss without the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case