Deepak Ramprasad Verma vs Deepa Deepak Verma — 50/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
Marriage Petn.
CNR: MHNG090012122025
e-Filing Number
13-03-2025
Filing Number
136/2025
Filing Date
19-Mar-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
19-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
12-Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deepak Ramprasad Verma
Adv. VERMA RAVIPRAKASH GAJANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepa Deepak Verma
Case History
-
27-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
03-Feb-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
23-Dec-2025
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
10-Nov-2025
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
25-Sep-2025
Steps
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
07-Aug-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
11-Jul-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
05-May-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In HMP No.50/2025 (Deepak Vs. Deepa), the Civil Judge granted permission to issue notice to the respondent through RPAD (Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due) instead of regular service, since the respondent resides outside the court's jurisdiction. The petitioner bears the expenses of this alternate mode of service to avoid delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Senior Division, Saoner
-
04-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2025
Summary: In HMP No.50/2025 (Deepak Vs. Deepa), the Civil Judge granted permission to issue notice to the respondent through RPAD (Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due) instead of regular service, since the respondent resides outside the court's jurisdiction. The petitioner bears the expenses of this alternate mode of service to avoid delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts