State Of Maharashtra P. S. Khaparkheda vs Akash Ramdas Dehnkar — 521/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090008102026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

703/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

521/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

151

Police Station

KHAPARKHEDA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra P. S. Khaparkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akash Ramdas Dehnkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Akash Ramdas Dehnkar (521/2026) The Lok Adalat (People's Court) in Saner convicted the respondent Akash Ramdas Dehnkar under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for a minor offense. The respondent voluntarily pleaded guilty and deposited a fine of ₹500 in court. The court found the respondent's conduct satisfactory and ordered closure of the case after imposing the monetary penalty as punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 521/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Akash Ramdas Dehnkar (521/2026) The Lok Adalat (People's Court) in Saner convicted the respondent Akash Ramdas Dehnkar under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for a minor offense. The respondent voluntarily pleaded guilty and deposited a fine of ₹500 in court. The court found the respondent's conduct satisfactory and ordered closure of the case after imposing the monetary penalty as punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case