Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner. vs Gajanan Dhanraj Lad — 451/2026

Case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090007432026

Filing Number

636/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

451/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Police Act Section 102,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State P. S.Saoner.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gajanan Dhanraj Lad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 451/2026 The National Public Interest Tribunal (Lok Adalat) at Saoner found Gajanan Dhanraj Lad (45 years old) guilty under Sections 102/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act for obstructing a public road by placing fruit/vegetable stock on the street at Gadkari Chowk, Saoner on 19/08/2025. The accused confessed voluntarily to the charges. The tribunal convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹500, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 451/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 451/2026 The National Public Interest Tribunal (Lok Adalat) at Saoner found Gajanan Dhanraj Lad (45 years old) guilty under Sections 102/117 of the Maharashtra Police Act for obstructing a public road by placing fruit/vegetable stock on the street at Gadkari Chowk, Saoner on 19/08/2025. The accused confessed voluntarily to the charges. The tribunal convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹500, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case