State of Maharashtra P.S.Khapa vs Saurabh Ishwar Lanjewar — 419/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090006922026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

588/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

419/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

KHAPA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S.Khapa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saurabh Ishwar Lanjewar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 419/2026 The National Public Interest Litigation Court (Saner, Nagpur) found defendant Saurabh Ishwar Lanjewar guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code. The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty and paid a fine of ₹500, which the court accepted as satisfactory punishment given the minor nature of the offense. The case was closed following the imposition of this penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 419/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 419/2026 The National Public Interest Litigation Court (Saner, Nagpur) found defendant Saurabh Ishwar Lanjewar guilty under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code. The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty and paid a fine of ₹500, which the court accepted as satisfactory punishment given the minor nature of the offense. The case was closed following the imposition of this penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case