Kavita Milind Jain vs Rameshchand Fulchand Jain Advocate - Adv. M.P. Choudhari for deft no. — 19/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Order. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG090004982024
e-Filing Number
21-02-2024
Filing Number
80/2024
Filing Date
21-Feb-2024
Registration No
19/2024
Registration Date
21-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kavita Milind Jain
Adv. Adv. P.K. Katariya and Adv. S.P. Jain
-
2.Punji Milind Jain
Adv. Adv. P.K. Katariya and Adv. S.P. Jain
-
3.Prem Milind Jain
Adv. Adv. P.K. Katariya and Adv. S.P. Jain
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rameshchand Fulchand Jain Advocate - Adv. M.P. Choudhari for deft no.
-
2.Dilip Fulchand Jain
Adv. Adv. P.D. Sarve for detf. no. 2 to
-
3.Jaindas Fulchand Jain
Adv. Adv. P.D. Sarve for detf. no. 2 to
-
4.Mohan Fulchand Jain
Adv. Adv. P.D. Sarve for detf. no. 2 to
-
5.Amar Fulchand Jain
Adv. Adv. P.D. Sarve for detf. no. 2 to
-
6.Renuka Rameshchand Jain through Natural Guardian Shri. Rameshchand Fulchand Jain
-
7.Mahesh Deshraj Grover
Adv. Adv. R. Tomar for deft. no. 7
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
20-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
20-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
29-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
18-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
26-Sep-2025
Compliance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
19-Aug-2025
Compliance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
09-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No. 7 for permission to file his Written Statement is ALLOWED. Although the defendant filed significantly late (10 months after the 30-day deadline), the court accepted his reasons including health issues, family emergencies, and age (70 years), permitting him to file the statement to ensure the matter is decided on merits. However, the defendant is ordered to pay Rs. 400 as cost to the opposing party as penalty for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jul-2025
Compliance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
17-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
07-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
15-Jan-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
04-Dec-2024
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
17-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
26-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
23-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
22-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
14-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
26-Apr-2024
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
16-Apr-2024
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
10-Apr-2024
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
30-Mar-2024
Written Statement
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
12-Mar-2024
Written Statement
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
01-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
-
21-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2024
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No. 7 for permission to file his Written Statement is ALLOWED. Although the defendant filed significantly late (10 months after the 30-day deadline), the court accepted his reasons including health issues, family emergencies, and age (70 years), permitting him to file the statement to ensure the matter is decided on merits. However, the defendant is ordered to pay Rs. 400 as cost to the opposing party as penalty for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts