Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre Through Power of Attorney Yogita Yogeshwar Karadbhajne vs State of Mah. P.S.Khapa — 26/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG090003162026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
273/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
KHAPA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre Through Power of Attorney Yogita Yogeshwar Karadbhajne
Adv. GAJBHIYE SUSHMA PRASHANT
Respondent(s)
State of Mah. P.S.Khapa
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | Order | |
| 02-04-2026 | Order | |
| 27-03-2026 | Order | |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application for return of a seized trolley to the applicant Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, relying on the Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not remain at police stations. The applicant demonstrated authority via power of attorney from the registered owner and produced supporting documents including vehicle particulars and insurance. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,60,000 with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or disposal until trial conclusion, requiring production in court when directed, and mandating detailed panchnama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the application for return of a seized trolley to the applicant Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, relying on the Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not remain at police stations. The applicant demonstrated authority via power of attorney from the registered owner and produced supporting documents including vehicle particulars and insurance. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,60,000 with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or disposal until trial conclusion, requiring production in court when directed, and mandating detailed panchnama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts