Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre Through Power of Attorney Yogita Yogeshwar Karadbhajne vs State of Mah. P.S.Khapa — 26/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG090003162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

273/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

KHAPA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre Through Power of Attorney Yogita Yogeshwar Karadbhajne

Adv. GAJBHIYE SUSHMA PRASHANT

Respondent(s)

State of Mah. P.S.Khapa

Hearing History

Judge: 9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

10-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Order

02-04-2026

Order

27-03-2026

Order

24-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application for return of a seized trolley to the applicant Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, relying on the Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not remain at police stations. The applicant demonstrated authority via power of attorney from the registered owner and produced supporting documents including vehicle particulars and insurance. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,60,000 with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or disposal until trial conclusion, requiring production in court when directed, and mandating detailed panchnama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application for return of a seized trolley to the applicant Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, relying on the Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not remain at police stations. The applicant demonstrated authority via power of attorney from the registered owner and produced supporting documents including vehicle particulars and insurance. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,60,000 with conditions prohibiting sale, alteration, or disposal until trial conclusion, requiring production in court when directed, and mandating detailed panchnama documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case