Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre vs State of Mah. P.S.Khapa — 25/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG090003152026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
272/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
25/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
KHAPA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre
Adv. GAJBHIYE SUSHMA PRASHANT
Respondent(s)
State of Mah. P.S.Khapa
Hearing History
Judge: 9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Order | |
| 12-03-2026 | Order | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the applicant's petition and directed the Khapa Police Station to return a seized tractor (Registration No. MH-36-L-3398) to Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, finding him to be the prima facie owner based on verified registration certificate, Aadhar card, and insurance documents. The court reasoned that keeping seized property at a police station for extended periods risks damage and serves no purpose, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The release was conditioned on the applicant executing a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and undertaking not to sell, transfer, or alter the vehicle until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the applicant's petition and directed the Khapa Police Station to return a seized tractor (Registration No. MH-36-L-3398) to Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, finding him to be the prima facie owner based on verified registration certificate, Aadhar card, and insurance documents. The court reasoned that keeping seized property at a police station for extended periods risks damage and serves no purpose, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The release was conditioned on the applicant executing a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and undertaking not to sell, transfer, or alter the vehicle until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts