Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre vs State of Mah. P.S.Khapa — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG090003152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

272/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

KHAPA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre

Adv. GAJBHIYE SUSHMA PRASHANT

Respondent(s)

State of Mah. P.S.Khapa

Hearing History

Judge: 9-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Order

11-03-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the applicant's petition and directed the Khapa Police Station to return a seized tractor (Registration No. MH-36-L-3398) to Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, finding him to be the prima facie owner based on verified registration certificate, Aadhar card, and insurance documents. The court reasoned that keeping seized property at a police station for extended periods risks damage and serves no purpose, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The release was conditioned on the applicant executing a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and undertaking not to sell, transfer, or alter the vehicle until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the applicant's petition and directed the Khapa Police Station to return a seized tractor (Registration No. MH-36-L-3398) to Namrsen Bhimrao Dongre, finding him to be the prima facie owner based on verified registration certificate, Aadhar card, and insurance documents. The court reasoned that keeping seized property at a police station for extended periods risks damage and serves no purpose, citing the Supreme Court's precedent in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat*. The release was conditioned on the applicant executing a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond and undertaking not to sell, transfer, or alter the vehicle until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case