Tanaji Baburao Choure vs The Chief Executive Officer Municipal Council Advocate - S. M. Pande — 8/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CODEOFCIVILPROCEDURE. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG090002802026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

29-01-2026

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section CODEOFCIVILPROCEDURE

Petitioner(s)

Tanaji Baburao Choure

Adv. KHANGARE MANOJKUMAR CHIRKUT

Respondent(s)

The Chief Executive Officer Municipal Council Advocate - S. M. Pande

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

30-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

27-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

18-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, Nagpur (R.C.S. No. 08/2026), the court heard a reply to an application under Order 7, Rule 11 of CPC seeking rejection of the plaintiff's plaint for declaration, permanent injunction. The defendant contended the application is not procedurally maintainable, arguing the plaintiff lacks ownership claims over the disputed property as the defendant is the absolute owner with tax receipts issued. The case appears to be adjourned for further hearing with "Other side to say." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, Nagpur (R.C.S. No. 08/2026), the court heard a reply to an application under Order 7, Rule 11 of CPC seeking rejection of the plaintiff's plaint for declaration, permanent injunction. The defendant contended the application is not procedurally maintainable, arguing the plaintiff lacks ownership claims over the disputed property as the defendant is the absolute owner with tax receipts issued. The case appears to be adjourned for further hearing with "Other side to say." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case