Tanaji Baburao Choure vs The Chief Executive Officer Municipal Council Advocate - S. M. Pande — 8/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CODEOFCIVILPROCEDURE. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG090002802026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
42/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tanaji Baburao Choure
Adv. KHANGARE MANOJKUMAR CHIRKUT
Respondent(s)
The Chief Executive Officer Municipal Council Advocate - S. M. Pande
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, Nagpur (R.C.S. No. 08/2026), the court heard a reply to an application under Order 7, Rule 11 of CPC seeking rejection of the plaintiff's plaint for declaration, permanent injunction. The defendant contended the application is not procedurally maintainable, arguing the plaintiff lacks ownership claims over the disputed property as the defendant is the absolute owner with tax receipts issued. The case appears to be adjourned for further hearing with "Other side to say." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, Nagpur (R.C.S. No. 08/2026), the court heard a reply to an application under Order 7, Rule 11 of CPC seeking rejection of the plaintiff's plaint for declaration, permanent injunction. The defendant contended the application is not procedurally maintainable, arguing the plaintiff lacks ownership claims over the disputed property as the defendant is the absolute owner with tax receipts issued. The case appears to be adjourned for further hearing with "Other side to say." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts