State Excise Department vs Roshan Shantaram Dhobale And 2 Others Advocate - P. N. Kale — 102/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 68,84. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG090001872024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

174/2024

Filing Date

23-01-2024

Registration No

102/2024

Registration Date

23-01-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

385

Police Station

SAONER

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 68,84

Petitioner(s)

State Excise Department

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Roshan Shantaram Dhobale And 2 Others Advocate - P. N. Kale

Sagar Shravan Dhote

Kishor Ashok Devkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner.

10-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Judgment

23-03-2026

Judgment

17-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Saoner acquitted all three accused persons (Roshan Shantaram Dhobale, Sagar Shravan Dhote, and Kishor Ashok Devkar) of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Sections 65(b) and 84, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible independent witness evidence and procedural deficiencies in the seizure documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

05-01-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Saoner acquitted all three accused persons (Roshan Shantaram Dhobale, Sagar Shravan Dhote, and Kishor Ashok Devkar) of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Sections 65(b) and 84, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible independent witness evidence and procedural deficiencies in the seizure documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case