Rachna Upadhayay vs Mahesh Upadhayay — 133/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG080069652015
Filing Number
408/2018
Filing Date
26-Apr-2018
Registration No
133/2018
Registration Date
26-Apr-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rachna Upadhayay
Adv. Adv. S.M.Kushwaha
-
2.Apeksha Mahesh Upadhayay
-
3.Aastha Upadhayay
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesh Upadhayay
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-May-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Nov-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
30-Jun-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
19-Mar-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
21-May-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2024
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
09-Sep-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
30-Apr-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
18-Jan-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Nov-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
19-Oct-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-May-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
04-Mar-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-Jan-2022
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
26-Oct-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Sep-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2021
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
09-Nov-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Jul-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
08-Jun-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Feb-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2020
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2019
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 133/2018 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with partial relief. The court ordered respondent Mahesh Upadhayay to pay maintenance to petitioner Rachna Upadhayay (Petitioner 1) at Rs. 1,000 per month and Rs. 500 per month each to Petitioners 2 and 3, payable within specified timeframe. Key Facts: This was a matrimonial maintenance petition under CrPC Section 125 filed by a wife and two children against the husband. The court found the husband employed with sufficient income (Rs. 50,000+ annually from property) and capable of providing maintenance, while the petitioners lacked adequate means of support. The court rejected the husband's defense that he had already provided maintenance and found him liable for spousal and child support obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Nov-2019
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
23-Sep-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Aug-2019
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
13-Jul-2019
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2019
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-May-2019
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2019
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
22-Feb-2019
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-Jan-2019
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
10-Jan-2019
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2018
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2018
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
10-Aug-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
17-Jul-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2018
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-May-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 133/2018
Case Summary: 133/2018 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED with partial relief. The court ordered respondent Mahesh Upadhayay to pay maintenance to petitioner Rachna Upadhayay (Petitioner 1) at Rs. 1,000 per month and Rs. 500 per month each to Petitioners 2 and 3, payable within specified timeframe. Key Facts: This was a matrimonial maintenance petition under CrPC Section 125 filed by a wife and two children against the husband. The court found the husband employed with sufficient income (Rs. 50,000+ annually from property) and capable of providing maintenance, while the petitioners lacked adequate means of support. The court rejected the husband's defense that he had already provided maintenance and found him liable for spousal and child support obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts