State of Maharashtra vs Rohit Chawahan Advocate - S.299 crpc — 222/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG080037022015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
580/2016
Filing Date
03-11-2016
Registration No
222/2016
Registration Date
03-11-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Kanhan
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Rohit Chawahan Advocate - S.299 crpc
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-01-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kamthi acquitted defendant Rohit Tofosing Chavhan of charges under IPC Sections 452 (house trespass), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical gaps including the complainant's unavailability as witness, lack of independent corroboration from panch witnesses, and the defendant's prolonged absence from proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Kamthi acquitted defendant Rohit Tofosing Chavhan of charges under IPC Sections 452 (house trespass), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (insult with intent to provoke breach of peace). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical gaps including the complainant's unavailability as witness, lack of independent corroboration from panch witnesses, and the defendant's prolonged absence from proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts