State of Maharashtra vs Suraj Chudaman Wadibhasme Advocate - s. 299 crpc — 131/2016
Case under Animal Preservation Act ( Maharashtra ) Section 5(a),(1)(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG080036252015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
525/2016
Filing Date
12-10-2016
Registration No
131/2016
Registration Date
12-10-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISCHARGED
FIR Details
FIR Number
3058
Police Station
Kamptee
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Suraj Chudaman Wadibhasme Advocate - s. 299 crpc
Nasim Kasai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 21-11-2025 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the accused in this animal cruelty case under Sections 5(A)(1)(2) of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and 11(1)(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, citing that the accused had been absconding for over 9 years since 2016 and key witnesses (informant, panch witnesses, investigating officer) could not be traced. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence to frame charges due to the unavailability of witnesses and no likelihood of the accused's appearance in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the accused in this animal cruelty case under Sections 5(A)(1)(2) of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and 11(1)(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, citing that the accused had been absconding for over 9 years since 2016 and key witnesses (informant, panch witnesses, investigating officer) could not be traced. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence to frame charges due to the unavailability of witnesses and no likelihood of the accused's appearance in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts