Sanghapal Wasudeo Gourkhede vs Yashwant Zadabaji Meshram Advocate - A. D. Bhimte — 47/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

M.J.Cases - M.J.C

CNR: MHNG080033442015

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

153/2016

Filing Date

19-08-2016

Registration No

47/2016

Registration Date

19-08-2016

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Sanghapal Wasudeo Gourkhede

Adv. P. t. Gajwe

Respondent(s)

Yashwant Zadabaji Meshram Advocate - A. D. Bhimte

Pruthvi Zadabaji Meshram

Yuvraj Zadabaji Meshram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Order

26-02-2026

Order

23-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected Sanghpal's application seeking action against Yashwant for allegedly breaching a temporary injunction order that prohibited construction over a 3-foot drainage lane between their properties. The court found that Sanghpal failed to prove that Yashwant constructed on the restricted lane; photographic evidence actually showed the drainage lane remained intact with no encroachment by Yashwant. The court noted that Sanghpal himself had constructed a room near the drainage line, contradicting his claims of breach by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

01-11-2023
Evidence
07-08-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected Sanghpal's application seeking action against Yashwant for allegedly breaching a temporary injunction order that prohibited construction over a 3-foot drainage lane between their properties. The court found that Sanghpal failed to prove that Yashwant constructed on the restricted lane; photographic evidence actually showed the drainage lane remained intact with no encroachment by Yashwant. The court noted that Sanghpal himself had constructed a room near the drainage line, contradicting his claims of breach by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case