State of Maharashtra vs Imamuddin Moh. Sallauddin — 1609/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080029282025

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

2673/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

1609/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

559

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Imamuddin Moh. Sallauddin

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court convicted the respondent Imamuddin Moh. Sallauddin under Indian Penal Code Sections 294 and 265, imposing a fine of Rs. 200 (or eight days imprisonment in default) for committing acts of criminal intimidation and obscene conduct. The court found the respondent guilty after examining evidence and concluding that the prosecution had proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the respondent's defense claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1609/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent Imamuddin Moh. Sallauddin under Indian Penal Code Sections 294 and 265, imposing a fine of Rs. 200 (or eight days imprisonment in default) for committing acts of criminal intimidation and obscene conduct. The court found the respondent guilty after examining evidence and concluding that the prosecution had proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the respondent's defense claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case