Omvati Rameshwar Yadav vs Raju Harinarayan Yadav Advocate - S.S.Meshram — 121/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG080024302023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-11-2023
Filing Number
251/2023
Filing Date
02-11-2023
Registration No
121/2023
Registration Date
03-11-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Omvati Rameshwar Yadav
Adv. S.A.Dutonde
Respondent(s)
Raju Harinarayan Yadav Advocate - S.S.Meshram
Mansingh Harinarayan Yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-01-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 09-12-2025 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - RCS No. 121/2023 (Omwati Vs. Raju) The defendant's application for adjournment, citing attendance at a brother-in-law's funeral, was rejected by the court. The court found the application unmeritorious as the defendant had previously received specific directions to cross-examine plaintiff witnesses, multiple similar adjournment requests had been made on the same grounds, and the plaintiff had already filed evidence affidavits for three witnesses. The partition and separate possession suit proceeds as scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - RCS No. 121/2023 (Omwati Vs. Raju) The defendant's application for adjournment, citing attendance at a brother-in-law's funeral, was rejected by the court. The court found the application unmeritorious as the defendant had previously received specific directions to cross-examine plaintiff witnesses, multiple similar adjournment requests had been made on the same grounds, and the plaintiff had already filed evidence affidavits for three witnesses. The partition and separate possession suit proceeds as scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts