State of Maharashtra vs Aman Anwar Khan — 1238/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080023702025

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

06-11-2025

Filing Number

2143/2025

Filing Date

06-11-2025

Registration No

1238/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee

FIR Details

FIR Number

520

Police Station

Kanhan

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112
Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12
Maharashtra Police Act Section 142

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Aman Anwar Khan

Sushant Rajkumar Meshram

Adv. null

Abhishek Shyam Suryavanshi

Adv. null

Aniket Raajoo Vaidya

Sagar Yuvraj Chavhan

Adv. null

Anant Sumanlal Aatankar

Adv. null

Rohan Yuvraj Chavhan

Adv. null

Naresh Babulal Dhurve

Adv. null

Vinay Vinod Bhelawae

Adv. null

Shrikant Bharat Shelare

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee

25-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

17-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized mobile phone (Oppo A5 Pro) was allowed. The court ordered the handset be delivered to the applicant upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 20,000, with conditions that he cannot create third-party interests, modify, alter, or delete data on the device. The Investigating Officer was directed to produce supporting documents before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized mobile phone (Oppo A5 Pro) was allowed. The court ordered the handset be delivered to the applicant upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 20,000, with conditions that he cannot create third-party interests, modify, alter, or delete data on the device. The Investigating Officer was directed to produce supporting documents before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case