Suresh Dhanraj Dhawale vs Dhanraj Mahadeo Dhawale Advocate - Arvind Gharde — 98/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG080021802023

Filing Number

209/2023

Filing Date

15-Sep-2023

Registration No

98/2023

Registration Date

15-Sep-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

10-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Dhanraj Dhawale

    Adv. S.M. Kushwaha

  2. 2.Rambhau Dhanraj Dhawale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanraj Mahadeo Dhawale Advocate - Arvind Gharde

  2. 2.Subhash Dhanraj Dhawale

  3. 3.Bhushan Subhash Dhawale

  4. 4.Omprakash Subhash Dhawale

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  8. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  9. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  10. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  11. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  12. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  13. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  14. 05-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY The court rejected Defendant No.1's application to dismiss the plaint filed by Suresh and others in a partition suit involving ancestral property. The court found that the plaintiffs stated a valid cause of action, the suit was within the limitation period, proper court fees were paid under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, and the question of pecuniary jurisdiction could be addressed later if necessary. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Compliance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Order

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  19. 13-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  20. 22-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  21. 08-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  22. 10-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  23. 21-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  24. 31-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  25. 09-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  26. 11-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  27. 16-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  28. 13-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  29. 28-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  30. 08-Feb-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  31. 24-Jan-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  32. 02-Jan-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  33. 30-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  34. 08-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  35. 26-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  36. 04-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  37. 15-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 15-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2023

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court rejected Defendant No.1's application to dismiss the plaint filed by Suresh and others in a partition suit involving ancestral property. The court found that the plaintiffs stated a valid cause of action, the suit was within the limitation period, proper court fees were paid under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act, and the question of pecuniary jurisdiction could be addressed later if necessary. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case