State of Maharashtra vs Manoj Rajaram Yadav 3 — 286/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,294,506,34,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG080021472021
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1922/2021
Filing Date
09-10-2021
Registration No
286/2021
Registration Date
09-10-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
FIR Details
FIR Number
307
Police Station
Kanhan
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Manoj Rajaram Yadav 3
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness No. 7 (Dr. Yogesh Narayan Choudhari, a Medical Officer) in case R.C.C. No.286/2021 State v. Manoj Yadav, dated 02/04/2024. The witness testified that on 12/08/2021, he examined two assault victims at Primary Health Center Kanhan—Karimuddin Salim Ansari (46 years) who had head injury and left shoulder tenderness, and Shahin Ansari (36 years) who had severe chest pain due to a known heart condition—and referred both to I.G.M.C. Nagpur for further treatment. During cross-examination, the witness maintained the accuracy of his medical findings and denied allegations of false deposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness No. 7 (Dr. Yogesh Narayan Choudhari, a Medical Officer) in case R.C.C. No.286/2021 State v. Manoj Yadav, dated 02/04/2024. The witness testified that on 12/08/2021, he examined two assault victims at Primary Health Center Kanhan—Karimuddin Salim Ansari (46 years) who had head injury and left shoulder tenderness, and Shahin Ansari (36 years) who had severe chest pain due to a known heart condition—and referred both to I.G.M.C. Nagpur for further treatment. During cross-examination, the witness maintained the accuracy of his medical findings and denied allegations of false deposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts