State of Maharashtra vs Satpal Chandrakishor Tularam — 892/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG080018132025
e-Filing Number
21-08-2025
Filing Number
1655/2025
Filing Date
21-Aug-2025
Registration No
892/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
196
Police Station
old Kamptee
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satpal Chandrakishor Tularam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Satpal Chandrakishor Tularam (892/2025) The court decided to impose a fine of Rs. 200 under Indian Penal Code Section 294 (obscene acts in public) on respondent Satpal Chandrakishor Tularam, with an alternative of 1 day imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. The respondent admitted guilt to three charges: criminal intimidation, obscene conduct, and vulgar behavior. The court found the charges substantiated and imposed the penalty accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
06-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 892/2025
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Satpal Chandrakishor Tularam (892/2025) The court decided to impose a fine of Rs. 200 under Indian Penal Code Section 294 (obscene acts in public) on respondent Satpal Chandrakishor Tularam, with an alternative of 1 day imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. The respondent admitted guilt to three charges: criminal intimidation, obscene conduct, and vulgar behavior. The court found the charges substantiated and imposed the penalty accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts