State of Maharashtra vs Sant Kumar Pradhan — 880/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080017772025

e-Filing Number

20-08-2025

Filing Number

1623/2025

Filing Date

20-Aug-2025

Registration No

880/2025

Registration Date

21-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

246

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sant Kumar Pradhan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court upheld the conviction of Sant Kumar Pradhan under Indian Penal Code Section 285 for negligence causing danger. The court found the respondent guilty of rash and negligent conduct and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200, affirming that the evidence established the charges against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 880/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court upheld the conviction of Sant Kumar Pradhan under Indian Penal Code Section 285 for negligence causing danger. The court found the respondent guilty of rash and negligent conduct and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200, affirming that the evidence established the charges against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case