State of Maharashtra vs Ramprasad Nago Pardhi Advocate - Nitesh Wasnik — 1280/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG080017182019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1524/2019
Filing Date
04-09-2019
Registration No
1280/2019
Registration Date
04-09-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
290
Police Station
Kanhan
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ramprasad Nago Pardhi Advocate - Nitesh Wasnik
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-11-2025 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Kamthi Court acquitted truck driver Ramprasad Nago Pardhee of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 on April 8, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to establish that he was the truck operator responsible for the collision. While evidence confirmed injuries to the complainant and his companion from a road accident, the court found insufficient proof linking the accused truck to the incident or identifying him as the driver involved, requiring acquittal based on reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Kamthi Court acquitted truck driver Ramprasad Nago Pardhee of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 on April 8, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to establish that he was the truck operator responsible for the collision. While evidence confirmed injuries to the complainant and his companion from a road accident, the court found insufficient proof linking the accused truck to the incident or identifying him as the driver involved, requiring acquittal based on reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts