State of Maharashtra vs Tosif Iqbal Vakil Ahemad 10 Advocate - Pankaj Yadav — 1125/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080017122019

N.B.W._Unready

Next Hearing

18th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1518/2019

Filing Date

07-08-2019

Registration No

1125/2019

Registration Date

07-08-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee

FIR Details

FIR Number

286

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184,138/177

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Tosif Iqbal Vakil Ahemad 10 Advocate - Pankaj Yadav

Ikrar Abrar Qureshi

Adv. Pankaj Yadav

Mohd. Shoeb Abdul Raheman Qureshi

Adv. Pankaj Yadav

Wasim Akhtar Mohd. Aslam

Adv. Pankaj Yadav

Noor Ehsaan Qureshi

Adv. Pankaj Yadav

Hearing History

Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee

10-04-2026

N.B.W._Unready

10-03-2026

N.B.W._Unready

18-11-2025

N.B.W._Unready

28-08-2025

N.B.W._Ready

22-07-2025

N.B.W._Ready

Interim Orders

10-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by accused Tauseef Iqbal Wakeel Ahmad for permission to travel abroad to Saudi Arabia was allowed. The court granted him permission to go abroad for one year (10.04.2026 to 31.03.2027) to perform Hajj/Umrah, despite prosecution's opposition citing serious traffic offenses under IPC Section 279 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 184, 138/177. The accused was directed to furnish a surety of Rs. 50,000 and file an undertaking to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 if he fails to attend court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by accused Tauseef Iqbal Wakeel Ahmad for permission to travel abroad to Saudi Arabia was allowed. The court granted him permission to go abroad for one year (10.04.2026 to 31.03.2027) to perform Hajj/Umrah, despite prosecution's opposition citing serious traffic offenses under IPC Section 279 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 184, 138/177. The accused was directed to furnish a surety of Rs. 50,000 and file an undertaking to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 if he fails to attend court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case