Sau Harsha Pradip Tekade vs M/s Rajnandani Homes, Through Its Partners, Smt Yogita Raju Bhoyar, Shri Ramesh Mansaramani — 76/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151,order39rule1and2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG080013552024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-07-2024
Filing Number
174/2024
Filing Date
10-07-2024
Registration No
76/2024
Registration Date
11-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau Harsha Pradip Tekade
Adv. RAJURKAR KUNDAN SURESH
Sau Laxmi Shankarrao Sawarkar
Adv. RAJURKAR KUNDAN SURESH
Respondent(s)
M/s Rajnandani Homes, Through Its Partners, Smt Yogita Raju Bhoyar, Shri Ramesh Mansaramani
Shri Indrajit Jiwanlal Bawankule
Smt Chandrabhaga Jiwanlal Bawankule
Smt Heerabai Devidas Bhute
Smt Rukhma Banduji Tandulkar
Smt Bhagirathi Murlidhar Hatwar
Smt Bebi Laxman Fandi
Shri Nilkanth Jiwanlal Bawankule
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX CPC. All defendants (No.1 to 8) are restrained from executing any third-party interest over the disputed suit land (2.87 hectares) until final disposal of the case. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss favoring the plaintiffs in this property dispute involving an allegedly coerced gift deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX CPC. All defendants (No.1 to 8) are restrained from executing any third-party interest over the disputed suit land (2.87 hectares) until final disposal of the case. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss favoring the plaintiffs in this property dispute involving an allegedly coerced gift deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts