Kalawati W/o Shankar Sambhare vs Vishwanath Ghodmare S/o Tukaram Ghodmare Advocate - Adv. Manish Randeve — 68/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG080013382022
Filing Number
127/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
68/2022
Registration Date
22-Jun-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kalawati W/o Shankar Sambhare
Adv. Adv. C. Rohankar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vishwanath Ghodmare S/o Tukaram Ghodmare Advocate - Adv. Manish Randeve
-
2.Kisna @ Krishna Ghodmare S/o Tukaram Ghodmare
Adv. Adv. Girde
-
3.Shanta Tejramji Dhoble
-
4.Pankaj Vishwanath Ghodmare
-
5.Rupesh Vishwanath Ghodmare
-
6.Devidas Krishna Ghodmare
-
7.Lobha Kisna Ghodmare
-
8.General Manager, South East Central Railways
-
9.Sub-Divisional Officer, Mauda
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
-
12-Mar-2026
Compliance
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2025
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court allowed defendant No. 1's application to file a written statement beyond the stipulated time period (approximately 4 months late). The court accepted the defendant's explanation citing illness and delayed receipt of revenue records, and permitted the written statement to be taken on record in the interest of natural justice and to give the defendant a fair chance to defend the partition and permanent injunction suit filed by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2025
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
17-Aug-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
19-Jun-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Jun-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-Apr-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2023
Reply/Say
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
12-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Sep-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Jul-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2022
Summary: The court allowed defendant No. 1's application to file a written statement beyond the stipulated time period (approximately 4 months late). The court accepted the defendant's explanation citing illness and delayed receipt of revenue records, and permitted the written statement to be taken on record in the interest of natural justice and to give the defendant a fair chance to defend the partition and permanent injunction suit filed by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts