State of Maharashtra vs Abhimnyu Jagdish Sharma Advocate - P.I.Yadav — 858/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 4,5. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG080012132019
Filing Number
1071/2019
Filing Date
26-Jun-2019
Registration No
858/2019
Registration Date
26-Jun-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abhimnyu Jagdish Sharma Advocate - P.I.Yadav
-
2.Sarveshwar Sushant Kashyap
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2026
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Abhimnyu Jagdish Sharma Advocate & Others (858/2019) Outcome: Case adjourned. The First Class Judicial Magistrate recorded witness testimony from a police officer regarding a cricket betting raid at Kashyap Building in Kalmati, Nagpur. One accused (Sarveshwar Kashyap) was present; the other accused (Abhimnyu Sharma) was absent. The court rejected the defense's cross-examination contentions and adjourned proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
03-May-2023
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2023
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2023
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2022
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2022
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2022
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
25-Feb-2022
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2022
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2021
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2021
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2021
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
03-May-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
07-Sep-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2020
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2019
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
19-Oct-2019
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 858/2019
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Abhimnyu Jagdish Sharma Advocate & Others (858/2019) Outcome: Case adjourned. The First Class Judicial Magistrate recorded witness testimony from a police officer regarding a cricket betting raid at Kashyap Building in Kalmati, Nagpur. One accused (Sarveshwar Kashyap) was present; the other accused (Abhimnyu Sharma) was absent. The court rejected the defense's cross-examination contentions and adjourned proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts