State of Maharashtra vs Sachin Prakashrao Bombale — 201/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,409,406,120. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG080011412023
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3458/2023
Filing Date
03-06-2023
Registration No
201/2023
Registration Date
03-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
old Kamptee
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sachin Prakashrao Bombale
Sailesh Bharatlal Kochanwar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a judicial magistrate's order from Kamthi court (dated 18/04/2026) documenting witness examination and cross-examination in a bank fraud case (FIR 201/2023). The witness, a panchnama (independent witness), testified regarding the seizure of documents and electronic devices from the accused Shailesh's residence, including notebooks, notepads, and an electricity bill. The court recorded the witness's statement under examination-in-chief and cross-examination by both the prosecution and defense counsel, addressing questions about the panchnama procedure, evidence collection, and the voluntariness of the witness's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a judicial magistrate's order from Kamthi court (dated 18/04/2026) documenting witness examination and cross-examination in a bank fraud case (FIR 201/2023). The witness, a panchnama (independent witness), testified regarding the seizure of documents and electronic devices from the accused Shailesh's residence, including notebooks, notepads, and an electricity bill. The court recorded the witness's statement under examination-in-chief and cross-examination by both the prosecution and defense counsel, addressing questions about the panchnama procedure, evidence collection, and the voluntariness of the witness's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts