State of Maharashtra vs Latiq Pathan s/o Kasam Pathan — 607/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080009212026

Filing Number

845/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

607/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Latiq Pathan s/o Kasam Pathan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Kamathi Court (First Grade Magistrate, Kamathi) rejected the accused Latiq Pathan's petition on charges under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and Section 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection). The court found the accused guilty and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (or in default, 1 day imprisonment) under Section 285, while ordering acquittal under Section 269 due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Kamathi Court (First Grade Magistrate, Kamathi) rejected the accused Latiq Pathan's petition on charges under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire) and Section 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection). The court found the accused guilty and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (or in default, 1 day imprisonment) under Section 285, while ordering acquittal under Section 269 due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case