State of Maharashtra vs Amid Alsad Ahamad — 605/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080009192026

Filing Number

843/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

605/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amid Alsad Ahamad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court held that the respondent, Amid Alsad Ahamad, violated Indian Penal Code Section 285 by committing an act endangering life or personal safety. The court found the respondent guilty under Section 285 IPC and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days imprisonment as an alternative in default of payment. The sentence was passed in accordance with applicable criminal law provisions addressing rash or negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 605/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court held that the respondent, Amid Alsad Ahamad, violated Indian Penal Code Section 285 by committing an act endangering life or personal safety. The court found the respondent guilty under Section 285 IPC and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days imprisonment as an alternative in default of payment. The sentence was passed in accordance with applicable criminal law provisions addressing rash or negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case