Samreen Zehra Mohammad Abbas vs Mohammad Abbas Asgar Ali Advocate - Ex parte — 38/2023

Case under Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act Section 281. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG080009172023

Filing Number

90/2023

Filing Date

03-May-2023

Registration No

38/2023

Registration Date

03-May-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Samreen Zehra Mohammad Abbas

    Adv. Adv.B.R. Gedam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Abbas Asgar Ali Advocate - Ex parte

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Samreen Vs. Mohammad Abbas (R.C.S. No. 38/2023) The application for interim maintenance under Section 151 CPC was partly allowed. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the plaintiff from October 7, 2025, until final disposal of the suit, plus Rs. 3,000 as litigation costs. The court found that the defendant neglected to maintain his legally wedded wife despite having income capacity, and the plaintiff had no independent source of income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  14. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  15. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  17. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  18. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  19. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  20. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  22. 08-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  23. 18-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  24. 20-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  25. 06-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  26. 04-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  27. 04-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  28. 02-Dec-2023

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  29. 04-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  30. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  31. 25-Sep-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  32. 21-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  33. 18-Jul-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  34. 21-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  35. 03-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 03-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Samreen Vs. Mohammad Abbas (R.C.S. No. 38/2023) The application for interim maintenance under Section 151 CPC was partly allowed. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the plaintiff from October 7, 2025, until final disposal of the suit, plus Rs. 3,000 as litigation costs. The court found that the defendant neglected to maintain his legally wedded wife despite having income capacity, and the plaintiff had no independent source of income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case