State of Maharashtra vs Shahid Akhtar s/o Atikur Rahman — 552/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080008592026

Filing Number

785/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

552/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shahid Akhtar s/o Atikur Rahman

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shahid Akhtar (552/2026) The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 294 (obscene conduct) and Section 295 (insulting religion), sentencing him to Rs. 300 fine (in default, two days imprisonment) and ordering him to provide an apology and undertake education on communal harmony within seven days. The court held that the accused's deliberately provocative conduct violated national security provisions under IPC Section 294. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 552/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shahid Akhtar (552/2026) The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 294 (obscene conduct) and Section 295 (insulting religion), sentencing him to Rs. 300 fine (in default, two days imprisonment) and ordering him to provide an apology and undertake education on communal harmony within seven days. The court held that the accused's deliberately provocative conduct violated national security provisions under IPC Section 294. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case