State of Maharashtra vs Moh. Imran s/o Mushtaq Ahamd — 548/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080008552026

Filing Number

781/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

548/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Moh. Imran s/o Mushtaq Ahamd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 548/2026 State of Maharashtra v. Moh. Imran s/o Mushtaq Ahamd The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) and Section 509 (insulting modesty/integrity). The accused was ordered to pay a fine of ₹200/- (in default, one day's simple imprisonment) and instructed to undergo brief punishment as directed by the court. The judgment affirmed the prosecution's case regarding the criminal conduct established during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 548/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 548/2026 State of Maharashtra v. Moh. Imran s/o Mushtaq Ahamd The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) and Section 509 (insulting modesty/integrity). The accused was ordered to pay a fine of ₹200/- (in default, one day's simple imprisonment) and instructed to undergo brief punishment as directed by the court. The judgment affirmed the prosecution's case regarding the criminal conduct established during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case