Anil S/o Chhotelal Ramteke, vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — 46/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG080007992026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

731/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

10-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Kanhan

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil S/o Chhotelal Ramteke,

    Adv. GEDAM BHIMA RAMDAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Anil's application for interim custody of his seized CD Deluxe vehicle (Crime No. 182/2026, Bombay Prohibition Act violation) under Section 503 BNSS, finding him to be the registered owner with valid documentation. The vehicle was released to him upon executing a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions prohibiting third-party interest creation and alterations, with mandatory production during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Anil's application for interim custody of his seized CD Deluxe vehicle (Crime No. 182/2026, Bombay Prohibition Act violation) under Section 503 BNSS, finding him to be the registered owner with valid documentation. The vehicle was released to him upon executing a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions prohibiting third-party interest creation and alterations, with mandatory production during investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case