State of Maharashtra vs Kallu Rajlaxman Rajpasare — 498/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080007912026

Filing Number

724/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

498/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

10-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

Kanhan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kallu Rajlaxman Rajpasare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    I'm ready to summarize the Indian court case (498/2026, State of Maharashtra v. Kallu Rajlaxman Rajpasare), but I don't see the judgment text in your message. Please provide the court judgment, and I will: - Summarize what the court decided and key reasoning in 2-3 sentences - Keep it under 600 characters - Write in English regardless of source language - Focus only on THIS case, not precedents cited - Respond with "SKIP" if the text is unreadable Please share the judgment text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC., Kamptee

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 498/2026

casestatus.in Summary

I'm ready to summarize the Indian court case (498/2026, State of Maharashtra v. Kallu Rajlaxman Rajpasare), but I don't see the judgment text in your message. Please provide the court judgment, and I will: - Summarize what the court decided and key reasoning in 2-3 sentences - Keep it under 600 characters - Write in English regardless of source language - Focus only on THIS case, not precedents cited - Respond with "SKIP" if the text is unreadable Please share the judgment text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case