State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Moreshwar Chawhan Advocate - P.T.Gajwe — 359/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 337,506. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG080007462021
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
662/2021
Filing Date
24-03-2021
Registration No
359/2021
Registration Date
24-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
FIR Details
FIR Number
458
Police Station
Kanhan
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Moreshwar Chawhan Advocate - P.T.Gajwe
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 09-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 02-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 29-12-2025 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The application filed by the APP to add and alter charges against accused Sanjay was rejected on 20/02/2024. The court found no supporting evidence in the record for the proposed additional charges under Sections 341, 426, and 324 IPC (unlawful restraint, mischief, and voluntarily causing hurt), as there was no mobile seizure memo, the injury was simple, and the prosecution witness did not support the case. The charge remains as originally framed under Sections 337 and 506 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The application filed by the APP to add and alter charges against accused Sanjay was rejected on 20/02/2024. The court found no supporting evidence in the record for the proposed additional charges under Sections 341, 426, and 324 IPC (unlawful restraint, mischief, and voluntarily causing hurt), as there was no mobile seizure memo, the injury was simple, and the prosecution witness did not support the case. The charge remains as originally framed under Sections 337 and 506 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts