State of Maharashtra vs Ishwar Prajapathi Bhairavlalji Prajapathi — 448/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080007322026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

669/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

448/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ishwar Prajapathi Bhairavlalji Prajapathi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court answered three key questions affirmatively: (1) whether the accused obtained illegal benefit, (2) whether the accused misappropriated government funds under Indian Penal Code Section 409, and (3) whether the accused is guilty. The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200, ordering him to undergo additional imprisonment if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 448/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court answered three key questions affirmatively: (1) whether the accused obtained illegal benefit, (2) whether the accused misappropriated government funds under Indian Penal Code Section 409, and (3) whether the accused is guilty. The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200, ordering him to undergo additional imprisonment if the fine remained unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case