State of Maharashtra vs Yasin Sheikh s/o Sheikh Yusuf — 403/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080007022026

Filing Number

642/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

403/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

old Kamptee

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yasin Sheikh s/o Sheikh Yusuf

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Yasin Sheikh (403/2026) The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 285 (negligent act endangering life/safety) and Section 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life/safety). The accused was sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with provision for alternative imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. The judgment emphasizes that the accused's rash or negligent conduct violated Indian Penal Code provisions protecting public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 403/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Yasin Sheikh (403/2026) The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 285 (negligent act endangering life/safety) and Section 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life/safety). The accused was sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with provision for alternative imprisonment if fine remains unpaid. The judgment emphasizes that the accused's rash or negligent conduct violated Indian Penal Code provisions protecting public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case