Dipak Tulsidas Naik vs Shivdas Mohan Naik — 23/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG080002682025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2025
Filing Number
39/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
13-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dipak Tulsidas Naik
Adv. Sudhanshu Rotkar
Respondent(s)
Shivdas Mohan Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 10-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC., Kamptee
Reply/Say
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 15-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 08-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: Defendant No. 2's application to set aside the "no written statement" order and file a written statement was rejected. The court found insufficient grounds to permit the late filing, as Defendant No. 2 had failed to file within the 30-90 day period mandated by Order 8 Rule 1 of the CPC, and the case had already progressed to the evidence stage with cross-examinations completed and final arguments pending. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Defendant No. 2's application to set aside the "no written statement" order and file a written statement was rejected. The court found insufficient grounds to permit the late filing, as Defendant No. 2 had failed to file within the 30-90 day period mandated by Order 8 Rule 1 of the CPC, and the case had already progressed to the evidence stage with cross-examinations completed and final arguments pending. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts