State of Maharashtra vs Chandrashekhar Sheshrao Kuthe — 100/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG080002272025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
225/2025
Filing Date
04-02-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
04-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Kanhan
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Chandrashekhar Sheshrao Kuthe
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Chandrashekhar under the Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(E) for alleged unlawful possession of liquor, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to properly establish through credible witness testimony that the seized material was actually liquor, and the panchnama (seizure record) was not adequately proved, constituting a critical procedural error. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 255(1) and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted the accused Chandrashekhar under the Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(E) for alleged unlawful possession of liquor, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to properly establish through credible witness testimony that the seized material was actually liquor, and the panchnama (seizure record) was not adequately proved, constituting a critical procedural error. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 255(1) and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts