State of Maharashtra vs Chandrashekhar Sheshrao Kuthe — 100/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG080002272025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

225/2025

Filing Date

04-02-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

04-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

Kanhan

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Chandrashekhar Sheshrao Kuthe

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C

06-05-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Evidence

03-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused Chandrashekhar under the Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(E) for alleged unlawful possession of liquor, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to properly establish through credible witness testimony that the seized material was actually liquor, and the panchnama (seizure record) was not adequately proved, constituting a critical procedural error. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 255(1) and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Chandrashekhar under the Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(E) for alleged unlawful possession of liquor, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to properly establish through credible witness testimony that the seized material was actually liquor, and the panchnama (seizure record) was not adequately proved, constituting a critical procedural error. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 255(1) and acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case