Navnath Kisan Gajbhiye vs Jahir Abbas Gulam Rashul Hussain Advocate - Adv. Rajni Tiwari — 1/2021
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act Section 16. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG080000312021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
7/2021
Filing Date
04-01-2021
Registration No
1/2021
Registration Date
04-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Navnath Kisan Gajbhiye
Adv. D.K. Gawali
Respondent(s)
Jahir Abbas Gulam Rashul Hussain Advocate - Adv. Rajni Tiwari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Summary: The defendant's applications for condonation of delay in filing a written statement and for setting aside the no written statement order dated 20/08/2021 were allowed. The court found that the defendant's reasons for non-compliance—including Covid-19 pandemic restrictions and family illness—constituted genuine and bona fide mistakes. The court determined that allowing the defendant to file the written statement would enable adjudication on merit without prejudicing the plaintiff, and cited Supreme Court directives relaxing limitation periods during the pandemic. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's applications for condonation of delay in filing a written statement and for setting aside the no written statement order dated 20/08/2021 were allowed. The court found that the defendant's reasons for non-compliance—including Covid-19 pandemic restrictions and family illness—constituted genuine and bona fide mistakes. The court determined that allowing the defendant to file the written statement would enable adjudication on merit without prejudicing the plaintiff, and cited Supreme Court directives relaxing limitation periods during the pandemic. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts