State of Maharashtra vs Manoj Madan Pawar Advocate - APP Katol. — 1117/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070017002022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1596/2022
Filing Date
10-10-2022
Registration No
1117/2022
Registration Date
10-10-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
510
Police Station
Katol
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Katol.
Respondent(s)
Manoj Madan Pawar Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) Katol.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-08-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 08-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 04-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the accused Manoj Pawar of charges under Section 65-e of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The decision was based on the case being over three years old, the prosecution's repeated failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons, and the absence of any likelihood of future appearance. The seized motorcycle was confirmed to be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the accused Manoj Pawar of charges under Section 65-e of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The decision was based on the case being over three years old, the prosecution's repeated failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons, and the absence of any likelihood of future appearance. The seized motorcycle was confirmed to be returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts