VIJAY KRISHNAKANT CHAWHAN vs AMARSING TARASING JADHAV — 19/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S ODER 21. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG070008382025

Hearing

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

05-05-2025

Filing Number

61/2025

Filing Date

06-05-2025

Registration No

19/2025

Registration Date

06-05-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/S ODER 21

Petitioner(s)

VIJAY KRISHNAKANT CHAWHAN

Adv. SHAIKH ALTAF MOHAMMEDDEEN

PRAVIN KUMAR GOPALRAO MAKODE

Adv. SHAIKH ALTAF MOHAMMEDDEEN

Respondent(s)

AMARSING TARASING JADHAV

YASHODA LALCHAND RATHOD

JAYAWANTI FAGILAL RATHOD

CHUNDIBAI TARASING JADHAV

MANGU TARASING JADHAV

PANEBAI KASHIRAM CHAVHAN (died)

DURRAKDAS KASHIRAM CHAVHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

21-04-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

20-01-2026

Hearing

09-12-2025

Hearing

11-11-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

19-05-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court granted a status quo order directing defendants 1, 2, and 4-6 to maintain the status quo regarding alienation of the suit property until the next date of hearing. The suit seeks specific performance of a contract for sale of property worth Rs. 2,00,000, of which Rs. 1,75,000 has been paid, with the defendants allegedly attempting to alienate the property after agreeing to execute the sale deed. Ex parte orders were passed against defendants who did not appear, while defendant 5 received a no-say order due to non-compliance with court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a status quo order directing defendants 1, 2, and 4-6 to maintain the status quo regarding alienation of the suit property until the next date of hearing. The suit seeks specific performance of a contract for sale of property worth Rs. 2,00,000, of which Rs. 1,75,000 has been paid, with the defendants allegedly attempting to alienate the property after agreeing to execute the sale deed. Ex parte orders were passed against defendants who did not appear, while defendant 5 received a no-say order due to non-compliance with court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case